Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999  This article was an attempt to help those who haven't studied nutrition and have problems discerning the truth. I find it comical that some would even think it's controversial. Unless you want to comment on specifics of the article with which you disagree and WHY you think it's wrong, we really can’t learn anything. That’s what YT should be about, learning, not just I’m right and you’re wrong. I'm so sick of all the snide remarks, "maybe we ought to have a holistic and raw section,” What does that even mean and how does it relate to this article? Also, "throwing bait to the lions, what does that mean; do some of you actually think I wrote this thread to rile you up? I get a lot of PM's asking me about nutrition and one thing I learned is most people are very unsure of their knowledge. Some of the basic things in nutrition are not that controversial, as you go up the levels of knowledge it becomes more controversial, with different schools of thought, but this is some very basic stuff. |
I refuse to do this. You call threatening people with suspensions, bans, and removal from certain sections non threatening and accepting of opinions? Sorry, but I totally disagree and YES, I believe people are being baited. also lumped together unfairly. It actually is NOT comical at. all.
When some of us post opinions and we don't like the responses, we have to debate the knowledge. We don't have the benefit of telling people things that will censor them such as suspensions.